Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Reminder

Reminder: The Socrates Profile is due Tuesday 22nd. Your goal should be to turn in a complete rough draft on Monday so we can go over it in class. This will be your last formal essay (there will be other written work however).

Period 4 – We did not go over this today (Wednesday) because of the advisory Olympics schedule, but we will tomorrow. Also, please stay on track to read 10 pages a day of the Apology, like we discussed in class, even though we did not meet today.

You can find a copy of the written requirements for the Socrates Profile under the important documents link on my blog home page. Look for “socrates_profile_07.”

Period 1 and 4 - Some of you have not turned in debate reflections for the censorship debate. Please don't forget that, as you will not get a grade for the debate and debate prep without it.

DUE FRIDAY 5/18 Apology Reading pp. 61-70

Read pages 61-70

Mark the text by highlighting or underlining two sentences that strike you as interesting and/or directly significant for the trial. Directly significant for the trials means something that can be used by the prosecution or the defense to make their case.

ON YOUR BLOG (You should also print this out and keep it with your notes)

Indicate one sentence that you highlighted or underlined (give page number and section number) and write a short paragraph (at least 4 sentences) that explains why you underlined it or highlighted it. Be prepared to share this in discussion.

DUE THR 5/17 The Apology pp. 51-61

Read pages 51-61

Mark the text by highlighting or underlining two sentences that strike you as interesting and/or directly significant for the trial. Directly significant for the trials means something that can be used by the prosecution or the defense to make their case.

ON YOUR BLOG (You should also print this out and keep it with your notes)

Indicate one sentence that you highlighted or underlined (give page number and section number) and write a short paragraph (at least 4 sentences) that explains why you underlined it or highlighted it. Be prepared to share this in discussion.

Monday, May 14, 2007

DUE WED 5/16 The Apology

Read pages 39-50 (the ending sentence on p. 50 continues over to p. 51)

Mark the text by highlighting or underlining two sentences that strike you as interesting and/or directly significant for the trial. Directly significant for the trials means something that can be used by the prosecution or the defense to make their case.

ON YOUR BLOG (You should also print this out and keep it with your notes)

Indicate one sentence that you highlighted or underlined (give page number and section number) and write a short paragraph (at least 4 sentences) that explains why you underlined it or highlighted it. Be prepared to share this in discussion.

DUE TUE 5/15 Pericles Funeral Oration

Continue reading "Pericles Funeral Oration" up to p. 148 (bottom of page, section 42 line 10).

Highlight or underline one or two sentences that strike you as interesting. TRY to choose a sentence that you think might be relevant to the trial - something that might be quoted or refered to in an opening speech by either the prosecution or defense.

COME TO CLASS WITH YOUR MARKED TEXT.

POST ON BLOG -

Make a list of some of the Athenian values that you encountered in the text. Choose one and write a couple of sentences (or more) about why it might be good for the trial of Socrates.

We are not going to read the rest of the oration, so if you are interested you should read the rest on your own. We will move on to the Apology of Plato.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Grades and Homework

Period 1 - I have your debate grades in the computer. If you did not turn in your reflection I gave you a zero, but I'll change that once you turn in your reflection.

Period 4 - I will try to enter debate grades for you today or tomorrow. What I wrote for period 1 regarding the reflections applies to you also.

Homework: There is no due homework for Friday, but don't forget that skits, and your individual paragraphs, are due on Monday. I strongly suggest you look for your second source and/or do your "packet" reading tonight, so you can come prepared to work on your skit with your group.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Due THUR 5/10 Debate Reflection and Prep for Lit. Circle

Debate Reflection

DO NOT POST THIS ON YOUR BLOG, PRINT OUT (or handwrite) AND BRING TO CLASS

1. What were the opposition's best arguements during opening speech, cross-examination, and rebuttal? Write a few sentences for each one and indicate who the speaker was.

2. Give one or more examples of a person who did a good job preparing for debate and give an example of what they did. This can be a short paragraph, about 4 sentences.

3. What problems did you have working as a team? Did everyone pull their weight? This can be a short paragraph, about 4 sentences.

Don't forget that final lit. circle is tomorrow.


Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Reminders for WED 5/09

Don't forget professional dress for debate tomorrow, WED 5/09

Don't forget literature circles are this Thursday. If you have not finished your book, you need to finish it by Thursday.

Mr. J

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Reminder: Debate is this WED , 5/9

For your information: Here is the sequence of events with the times:
( I have made the constructive speeches one minute shorter). If you are giving/writing the speech take into account that you lose points if you are 1 minute above or 1 minute below your time.

Lincoln-Douglas Debate Format


Both sides are given a “resolution” that states the debate topic.

  • One side is called the “affirmative” (pro) side – they agree with the statement
  • The other side is called the “negative” (con) side – they disagree with the statement

For example:

Resolution: The Danish newspapers made the right decision in publishing controversial images of the prophet Mohamed.

The affirmative (pro) side agrees with this statement and attempts to persuade the judges that they are right using evidence and reason.

The negative (con) side disagrees and attempts to persuade the judges that the other side is wrong, using evidence and reason.

Sequence of Events During the Debate:

1. Affirmative Constructive Opening Speech (5 m.)

· 1 member of the affirmative team gives a prepared persuasive speech

· Constructive speeches include:

o Definition of key terms

o Arguments based on reason, ethics, and emotions that are supported by evidence and/or details

o Statement of values (e.g. Freedom of Speech)

2. Negative Team’s Cross-Examination (3 m.) - 3 rounds of 3 minutes for a total of 9 minutes. Three different people from cross-examination team and 1-3 people from the opening speech group defending. (like we did for the last debate)

· One member of the negative team will join the person who gave the constructive speech at the front. The negative team member will ask the positive team member questions. The questions are typically of two types:

o Clarifying Questions: The negative team member will ask the other to clarify terms, ideas, evidence etc…

o Rhetorical Questions: These are questions were the negative person knows the answers (or does not care what they are). The purpose is to point out weaknesses in the opponent’s argument.

3. Negative Constructive Speech (5 m.)

· 1 member of the affirmative team gives a prepared persuasive speech arguing that the affirmative team is wrong

o Negative constructive speeches include the same things as positive speeches (see bullet points for Positive constructive speech).

4. Positive Team’s Cross Examination (3 m.)

· See Negative Team’s Cross Examination for details, they are the same)

5. Prep Time – Each Team has 3 minutes to prep for the next round of debate, called the “rebuttal round.” All team members are included in the prep. Having well prepared and organized notes is essential here!

6. First Affirmative Rebuttal (4 m.)

· Rebuttals are used to attack their opponent’s constructive speeches and to defend their own position.

· According to “Wikipedia”, A rebuttal argument typically consists of three steps: signpost (indicating which argument the debater is refuting), explain (attacking flaws in the opponent's evidence or logic), and weigh (evaluating the arguments based on the standards).

7. Prep Time - Same as above

8. Negative Rebuttal – Same as above, but 6 m.

9. Affirmative Rebuttal – Same as above, but 3 m.

Monday, April 30, 2007

Note on Homework - Book Clubs this Thursday

Unless otherwise noted your homework for the week is to read your book club books and be prepared for book clubs this Thursday (5/4).