Saturday, May 5, 2007

Reminder: Debate is this WED , 5/9

For your information: Here is the sequence of events with the times:
( I have made the constructive speeches one minute shorter). If you are giving/writing the speech take into account that you lose points if you are 1 minute above or 1 minute below your time.

Lincoln-Douglas Debate Format


Both sides are given a “resolution” that states the debate topic.

  • One side is called the “affirmative” (pro) side – they agree with the statement
  • The other side is called the “negative” (con) side – they disagree with the statement

For example:

Resolution: The Danish newspapers made the right decision in publishing controversial images of the prophet Mohamed.

The affirmative (pro) side agrees with this statement and attempts to persuade the judges that they are right using evidence and reason.

The negative (con) side disagrees and attempts to persuade the judges that the other side is wrong, using evidence and reason.

Sequence of Events During the Debate:

1. Affirmative Constructive Opening Speech (5 m.)

· 1 member of the affirmative team gives a prepared persuasive speech

· Constructive speeches include:

o Definition of key terms

o Arguments based on reason, ethics, and emotions that are supported by evidence and/or details

o Statement of values (e.g. Freedom of Speech)

2. Negative Team’s Cross-Examination (3 m.) - 3 rounds of 3 minutes for a total of 9 minutes. Three different people from cross-examination team and 1-3 people from the opening speech group defending. (like we did for the last debate)

· One member of the negative team will join the person who gave the constructive speech at the front. The negative team member will ask the positive team member questions. The questions are typically of two types:

o Clarifying Questions: The negative team member will ask the other to clarify terms, ideas, evidence etc…

o Rhetorical Questions: These are questions were the negative person knows the answers (or does not care what they are). The purpose is to point out weaknesses in the opponent’s argument.

3. Negative Constructive Speech (5 m.)

· 1 member of the affirmative team gives a prepared persuasive speech arguing that the affirmative team is wrong

o Negative constructive speeches include the same things as positive speeches (see bullet points for Positive constructive speech).

4. Positive Team’s Cross Examination (3 m.)

· See Negative Team’s Cross Examination for details, they are the same)

5. Prep Time – Each Team has 3 minutes to prep for the next round of debate, called the “rebuttal round.” All team members are included in the prep. Having well prepared and organized notes is essential here!

6. First Affirmative Rebuttal (4 m.)

· Rebuttals are used to attack their opponent’s constructive speeches and to defend their own position.

· According to “Wikipedia”, A rebuttal argument typically consists of three steps: signpost (indicating which argument the debater is refuting), explain (attacking flaws in the opponent's evidence or logic), and weigh (evaluating the arguments based on the standards).

7. Prep Time - Same as above

8. Negative Rebuttal – Same as above, but 6 m.

9. Affirmative Rebuttal – Same as above, but 3 m.

Monday, April 30, 2007

Note on Homework - Book Clubs this Thursday

Unless otherwise noted your homework for the week is to read your book club books and be prepared for book clubs this Thursday (5/4).

Internet Resources

If you need it, here are some good websites that give easy to understand summaries of important Supreme Court cases. The American Library Association has a really good one with a section on free speech and censorship. It’s the first one on the list.

These are really good places to start research and get an idea what cases are important for you particular debate. Of course, there is also the photocopies on the 1st Amendment that we read in class.

American Library Association:

http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/firstamendment/courtcases/courtcases.htm

http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/CaseSummary.asp

http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/CourtCases.htm

http://www.landmarkcases.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_decision#Freedom_of_Speech_and_of_the_Press